|
|
E-mail this article to friend...
ELIMINATING HUMAN ERRORS IN MEDICAL PRACTICE
By: Patrice L. Spath
Brown-Spath & Associates
| Much has been written about securing caregivers'
compliance with practice guidelines and other "best practice" recommendations.
However, it appears that defining ideal practices may be easier than getting clinicians to
change their long-established habits. Caregivers seem to resist change even when it's the
right thing to do. For example, in a 1994 study of how well oncology nurses comply with
OSHA guidelines for handling cytotoxic drugs, researchers found that some of the nurses
used some protective equipment when preparing and administering cytotoxic drugs, but the
type of equipment and its frequency of use did not specifically meet OSHA guidelines. The
oncology nurses reported that barriers to using the appropriate protective equipment
included a lack of time, problems with availability, and concerns about patient reactions
(1). There two key factors that influence the caregiver's decision about adopting new practices. First, the practice changes you are asking them to make must have been proven to be the right thing to do. Unless a valid research study has substantiated the benefits of the new way of doing things, it's hard to create much enthusiasm for change. Second, the caregivers being asked to change their practices must personally feel it's the right thing to do. People should acknowledge that the practice change is a good thing for them and for their patients. If one or both of these criteria are not met, you are likely to find significant resistance to change. Simple Human Error If both of the criteria described above have been met and caregivers still slip back into their old habits, then what you are probably dealing with are human errors. When caregivers omit necessary steps in a patient care process, there are several possible reasons for their action:
James Reason, internationally known expert in the cause and correction of human errors, suggests that the simplest countermeasure for preventing errors is an appropriate reminder.(2) Listed below are some of his suggestions for what a good reminder system should be. Many of these characteristics could be applied to reminders used in patient care processes.
As your clinicians design outcomes management reminder tools (clinical pathways, protocols, care planning aids, computer-based decision support, etc.) tell them to keep Reason's suggestions in mind. The presence of reminders does not guarantee that clinicians will automatically change their behavior, however reminders are likely to bring about a substantial reduction in noncompliance that is due to simple human error. References (1) Mahon SM et al. "Safe Handling Practices of Cytotoxic Drugs: The Results of a Chapter Survey," Oncol Nurs Forum 1994; 21(7): 1157-65. (2) Reason, James. Managing the Risks of Organizational Accidents. Hampshire, England: Ashgate Publishing, Ltd. 1997. Copyright 2001 by Brown-Spath & Associates To Learn More: Patrice L. Spath is available for inhouse presentations on this and other health care quality and resource management topics. For further details, visit Brown-Spath & Associates on the web at: http://www.brownspath.com or write to: Brown-Spath & Associates, PO Box 721, Forest Grove, OR 97116. Visit the web site of Brown-Spath & Associates (www.brownspath.com) for the latest information on health care quality and resource management, free up-to-date articles on contemporary performance improvement topics and invaluable training resources. Our web site is updated at least quarterly, so be sure to return often! (05/01) |
[ Home | Products | Services | Free On-Line Resources | Upcoming Workshops ] |